Realtime Classroom & Video Platform

Outcomes

Context

Teaching platforms fail when media and roster logic live in one tangled process.

Challenge

Online learning needed multiparty A/V, screen share, whiteboard annotation, and classroom controls — not a generic consumer meeting link. Reliability depended on proper SFU media and session orchestration.

Approach

We worked across MediaSoup-based realtime media, Angular/Ionic classroom clients, and a NestJS video-chat backend with scheduling, localization, and ops-friendly deploy pipelines (Docker/Jenkins). Features covered rooms, chat moderation, media share, and synchronized teaching artifacts.

Architecture

MediaSoup SFU media plane, NestJS session/business API, Angular web clients, TypeScript Node media services, Dockerized deploy paths.

Scope

• —Multiparty A/V
• —Screen and media share
• —Whiteboard/annotation
• —Room moderation
• —Scheduling and session APIs

Constraints

• —Public IP/TLS requirements for WebRTC
• —Hardware-bound participant scale
• —Browser/device variance

Solution highlights

• —SFU architecture instead of fragile mesh-only demos
• —Clear split between media plane and Nest domain API
• —Classroom features (mute-all, private chat, export) treated as product

Technologies

Results

• —Multiparty realtime classrooms with shared media and whiteboard flows
• —Business API separated from media SFU concerns
• —Production build/deploy pipelines for web clients
• —Host controls for moderation and classroom operations

Lessons learned

• —WebRTC without an SFU plan is a demo, not a classroom.
• —Teaching features are why education buyers care.
• —Network runbooks prevent “no video” support spirals.